Section 2, Team 1 for Prof. Harvey's section and the crane project.
- Marino, David
- McIver, Keith
- Thrall, Laura
- Zienowicz, Kaitlyn
== "Active" pages ==
== External links ==
the rowan email is down so this is the best place that I though I could tell you what is going on.
forces =
92.5240
-458.1511
25.5484
-422.5978
33.5272
-407.9058
709.2755
-385.0912
These forces go in the order of 13,23,48,34,15,45,69,56.
The roof truss was done during the time after the progress report but was deleted or disregarded right away.
The witch's hat was evaluated right before the progress report but the matalb was messed up so the truss gave large amount of failures and so was disregarded. After the materials were bought I reevaluated the truss and found that it was better than the truss we were building.
i believe this is all that you guys needed.
:I'm going to drop the roof truss since we only need 2 other families of trusses and the Witch's Hat was given more serious consideration. KM
Table 2: Cable Suspended Bridge Evaluated at Various Weights
|
Optimal amount of points
|
Weight evaluated(lbs)
|
Cost(dollars)
|
|
6
|
70
|
26.75
|
|
6
|
75
|
27.44
|
|
6
|
100
|
30.86
|
|
7
|
150
|
37.01
|
|
8
|
250
|
47.41
|
|
9
|
500
|
69.25
|
|
10
|
750
|
89.33
|
|
11
|
760
|
90.11
|
|
Breaks
|
770
|
|
Original weight vs cost….the one which told us which amount of spans to use.
Averaged the difference between the points and found that 6 was the best.
Span vs Cost Dis regard the first 2 points
the other graph you needed
Comments (1)
Anonymous said
at 10:20 pm on Dec 19, 2007
Nice use of the wiki as a backup team communication tool. Overall, you did a good job of using this as a meeting record. It doesn't tell me much about your thought/design process, though.
You don't have permission to comment on this page.